math
Greenfield Public School (demo)Teacher
Class performance & diagnostic insights
Class accuracy
63.4%
20 of 20 students assessed
Highest score
88%
11 students
Lowest score
20%
4 students
Students needing support
5
below 50% on 4+ questions
Classwide blindspots
1
topics above the failure threshold
Overall understanding
Moderate
needs targeted intervention
No comparable earlier scan for at least 5 students, so no change since the last test is shown.
Topic-wise class performance View all topics →
Accuracy = answers right over answers given, across the students asked about the topic. A topic is a blindspot when more than the set share of the students asked show a gap.
Error causes (classwide)
- Calculation or careless error39%
- Conceptual misconception35%
- Procedural error17%
- Question misinterpretation9%
Most common cause
Calculation or careless error: 39% of the 23 recorded errors.
Calculation or careless error: 39% of the 23 recorded errors.
Teacher Copilot for the classwide blindspot
Fractions: 9 of 20 students show a gap
- 11 minQuick check: Add 1/3 and 1/5, giving the answer in simplest form.
- 21 minExplain the idea: A fraction names a part of a whole: the denominator says how many equal parts the whole is cut into and the numerator how many of them are taken.
- 32 minWork one example: Add 1/2 and 1/4, giving the answer in simplest form.
- 41 minFix the common mistake: adds numerators and denominators separately
Built from curriculum notes and a verified worked solution (the shared lesson is not prepared yet).
Open the full scriptStudent performance distribution
Students by the share of their questions answered right. 0 student(s) have no DeepScan and are not in the chart.
Cohorts for differentiated learning
Struggling
5 students
below 40%
View students
- Aarav Sharma
- Ananya Iyer
- Diya Patel
- Rohan Mehta
- Kabir Singh
Emerging
4 students
40-70%
View students
- Arjun Reddy
- Ishita Verma
- Meera Nair
- Vivaan Gupta
Advanced
11 students
above 70%
View students
- Aditya Kulkarni
- Dev Menon
- Ira Banerjee
- Kiara Das
- Navya Bose
- Neel Desai
- Reyansh Pillai
- Saanvi Joshi
- Tara Chopra
- Yash Malhotra
- Zoya Khan
A cohort describes this scan, not the student. Homework tiers are decided per topic.
Quick actions
Students needing support (5)
| # | Student | Score | Reason | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aarav Sharma | 20% | Gaps in Algebra, Geometry | PTM sheet |
| 2 | Ananya Iyer | 20% | Gaps in Algebra, Geometry | PTM sheet |
| 3 | Diya Patel | 20% | Gaps in Algebra, Geometry | PTM sheet |
| 4 | Rohan Mehta | 20% | Gaps in Algebra, Geometry | PTM sheet |
| 5 | Kabir Singh | 25% | Gaps in Algebra, Fractions | PTM sheet |
This is an academic-support signal for a teacher to review. It is not a label and it triggers nothing automatically.
Top learning strengths
No topic is at 75% or above with enough evidence yet.
Insights for the school
- Class accuracy is 63.4% on the latest DeepScan of 20 of 20 students.
- 1 classwide blindspot: Fractions.
- 5 students are below 50% on at least 4 questions and may need support.
- No comparable earlier scan, so no change since the last test is shown.